Cadence Brace vs Reese Brantmeier Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 02 Jul at 10:13 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Brace vs R. Brantmeier

CAN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Brace 1 - 0 Brantmeier
They have played 2 sets in total, with Cadence Brace winning 2 and Reese Brantmeier winning 0. The last match between Cadence Brace and Reese Brantmeier was at the W100 Cary, 02-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Cadence Brace getting the victory 6-1 7-6(5).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Brace | 1 |
| Brantmeier | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W100 Cary(07-02-25)
C. Brace vs R. Brantmeier H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $68,925 | Career Prize Money | $9,110 |
| 58.88% (126-88) | Career Total W/L | 50.65% (39-38) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Brace vs R. Brantmeier Match Preview:
- In recent months, Brace has won 39.04% of points on their second serve, while Brantmeier has not won any points in this category. Could this indicate a decisive edge in Brace's favor?
- Returning serves shows a similar pattern, with Brantmeier failing to win any points on opponents' second serves, whereas Brace secures an impressive 50.33% of those points.
- First serve returns present a stark contrast: Brace excels with a 35.95% success rate, while Brantmeier again garners 0%.
- Under pressure, Brantmeier struggles, not saving any breakpoints, while Brace manages a 42.65% breakpoint save rate. Could this be critical during tense moments?
- Over the past year, Brantmeier has not registered any match wins, while Brace has a win percentage of 61.54%, indicating more consistent performance.
- Brantmeier’s best career surface is clay with a 55% win rate, while Brace's strength lies on hard courts with a 61% win rate.
- Facing stronger opponents, Brace has played against players with an average rank of 449.48. How might this experience influence their performance?
- In deciding sets, Brace has secured 50% of matches, whereas Brantmeier has not won any, suggesting stronger finishing ability for Brace.
- Brantmeier has not converted any breakpoint opportunities recently, while Brace succeeds 47.62% of the time, potentially a key stat for gaining upper hand.
Editorial Prediction (July 2, 2025, UTC):
As we examine the comparative statistics of these two players, Brace emerges with distinct competitive advantages. Their ability to consistently win points on both their second serve and return game presents a substantial edge over Brantmeier, who has struggled in these areas.
Furthermore, Brace’s capacity to save breakpoints and convert opportunities signals resilience and tactical acumen in crucial match moments. The stark disparity in performance under pressure could heavily tilt the match in Brace’s favor.
Given Brace’s recent form and historical strengths, along with Brantmeier's ongoing challenges, Brace is positioned as the likely winner in this upcoming encounter.
Cadence Brace vs Reese Brantmeier Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Brace vs R. Brantmeier H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 7 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:9:36 | Average Match Time | 2:9:36 |
| 74% (53/72) | 1st Serve % | 58% (35/60) |
| 68% (36/53) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (22/35) |
| 53% (10/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (10/25) |
| 67% (4/6) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (2/6) |
| 47% (28/60) | Return Points Win % | 36% (26/72) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Brace Recent Matches Played
R. Brantmeier Recent Matches Played

C. Brace vs R. Brantmeier Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.88% (126/88) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.65% (39/38) |
| 58.33% (280/200) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.26% (97/96) |
| 54.50% (2339/1953) | Games Win/Loss | 51.36% (960/909) |
| 61.24% (79/50) | Hard Win/Loss | 47.50% (19/21) |
| 56.67% (34/26) | Clay Win/Loss | 54.55% (18/15) |
| 52.00% (13/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 271 | Aces Total | 218 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 588 | Total Double Faults | 235 |
| 1:45:57 | Average Match Time | 1:38:28 |
| 444.66 | Average Opponent Rank | 569.36 |
| 61% (8253/13534) | 1st Serve % | 60% (2954/4953) |
| 61% (5075/8253) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (1878/2954) |
| 47% (2488/5281) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (943/1999) |
| 52% (869/1660) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (286/582) |
| 47% (6164/13068) | Return Points Win % | 44% (2209/4996) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Slam W/L | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 66.67% (4/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 58.33% (112/80) | Challenger W/L | 45.76% (27/32) |
| 69.23% (9/4) | Futures W/L | 81.82% (9/2) |
| 59% (124/209) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (38/76) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (17/38) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 21% (4/19) |
| 47% (26/55) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (20/40) |
| 90% (126/113) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 70% (43/30) |
| 10% (126/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 30% (43/13) |
| 15% (88/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (34/9) |